I started serious Investing Journey in Jan 2000 to create wealth through long-term investing and short-term trading; but as from April 2013 my Journey in Investing has changed to create Retirement Income for Life till 85 years old in 2041 for two persons over market cycles of Bull and Bear.

Since 2017 after retiring from full-time job as employee; I am moving towards Investing Nirvana - Freehold Investment Income for Life investing strategy where 100% of investment income from portfolio investment is cashed out to support household expenses i.e. not a single cent of re-investing!

It is 57% (2017 to Aug 2022) to the Land of Investing Nirvana - Freehold Income for Life!


Click to email CW8888 or Email ID : jacobng1@gmail.com



Welcome to Ministry of Wealth!

This blog is authored by an old multi-bagger blue chips stock picker uncle from HDB heartland!

"The market is not your mother. It consists of tough men and women who look for ways to take money away from you instead of pouring milk into your mouth." - Dr. Alexander Elder

"For the things we have to learn before we can do them, we learn by doing them." - Aristotle

It is here where I share with you how I did it! FREE Education in stock market wisdom.

Think Investing as Tug of War - Read more? Click and scroll down



Important Notice and Attention: If you are looking for such ideas; here is the wrong blog to visit.

Value Investing
Dividend/Income Investing
Technical Analysis and Charting
Stock Tips

Sunday, 11 January 2009

Property Investing: doing the Math (Part 4)

The fact is most wealthy people in Singapore made their money from this market segment. (one of the super friends actually make a fortune out of it)

To invest in property, you must have a substantial amount of capital. At least 50% of the property price so that you are not highly leverage. Leverage is a double-edged sword and can kill. So if you have that kind of capital, it is not a bad idea to invest in property.

What if capital not enough? Then gang up for Tenancy-in-common.

This is where each co-owner holds a separate and definite share in the property.

This arrangement is more common where the owners are not related to each other, eg. friends buying a property together for investment.

There is no right of survivorship in a tenancy-in-common. In other words, unlike a joint-tenancy, the deceased's interest does not pass automatically to the remaining co-owners.

Upon the death of a tenant-in-common, the deceased's interest can be distributed in accordance with his will (if any) or under the provisions of the Intestate Succession Act

Choice of like minded partners is important in any TIC agreement. The best is that everybody is in it purely for the money. Set clear financial goals and unwind on cue. Make sure that none of the TIC members occupy the key asset for any purpose eg residential or commercial use. Rent out to only independent tenants. Most important. Don’t fall in love with your investment.

-----------------------------------------------------------

What happens when a property is owned by two or more persons, and one person passes away? What’s the difference between “joint tenancy” and “tenancy-in-common”?

The law provides for two forms of ownership: “joint tenancy” and “tenancy-in-common”. The form of ownership is stated on the title document for the property.

Joint tenancy

This is where all the owners have an equal interest in the property regardless of the amount of money each co-owner had contributed towards the purchase of the property.
Married couples usually opt for joint tenancy when they buy a property. A joint tenancy overrides any will, and the survivor always gets the automatic right to assume ownership of the deceased’s share.

Thus, if a husband passes away first, then the wife as the survivor automatically takes over the husband’s share of the property. Even if the husband had made a will which stated how his share of the property should be distributed, his wife will automatically get to inherit his share.

Tenancy-in-common

This is where each co-owner holds a separate and definite share in the property.

This arrangement is more common where the owners are not related to each other, eg. friends buying a property together for investment.

There is no right of survivorship in a tenancy-in-common. In other words, unlike a joint-tenancy, the deceased's interest does not pass automatically to the remaining co-owners.

Upon the death of a tenant-in-common, the deceased's interest can be distributed in accordance with his will (if any) or under the provisions of the Intestate Succession Act.

investment property: What You’re Getting Yourself into?

As the prizes of goods swing and the stock market fluctuates, more and more people are finding investment property as a good business venture. This means that more and more people are buying land not to occupy it but for the purpose of securing capital gains or renting it out to others.

Why go this route? As any book will tell you, land is an asset that does not depreciate. And as foreign markets are putting up more businesses in Asia, it is not a wonder that land has become a very precious commodity. In Singapore alone, appreciation rose at 31% last year. However, reports are showing that this year, growth might be hindered by the downhill roll of the global market and by possible government interventions.

As more cities are becoming urbanized and as more urbanized cities are developing and getting more populated, several locations are being converted into single family homes, lofts, duplexes, apartments complexes, condominiums, townhouses and even vacation houses for the labor forces of these growing cities. These house rentals are not getting any cheaper either.

Do not limit yourself to residential areas though, as more residential areas are being overshadowed by commercial buildings.

Now, if you’re willing to take the risk. Here are few things to consider in investment property:

1. Make sure that the money you’re allotting for this project is in order. This is because investing on a property does not only mean paying for the land but also for repairs, maintenance, improvements and even surviving in between tenants.

2. Get your numbers straight. There are a lot of factors to consider in ensuring that you are making a sound investment. Your annual yield can help you analyze if the rent you collect in a year can make up for expenses. property value is always a good thing to know just in case you’re thinking of selling the said property. Your monthly cash flow could be an important gauge in this decision.

3. If you lack the experience, it might be a good idea to either hire a property manager who can help you take care of the details or pooling resources with known or trustworthy investment companies.

4. Even with help, do your own research. It’s always a good idea to build a network of contacts (Go to BullytheBear blog). They can give you a better thought on the value of the property in a particular area. The right friends (BullytheBear's superfriends) can alert you to coming foreclosures and sales. These people might even be able to help you acquire that elusive piece of fine real estate.

5. And just like the TV series, keep in mind that a sound investment relies mostly on “location, location, location”. Prime investment property, though, does not come cheap. It will take a sharp eye, patience and a lot of bargaining to find a good buy at a good price.

Private properties looking attractive

By Shila Naidu

THE recession has resulted in a 25-per-cent fall in private- property prices from their market peak, and with prices expected to dip further next year, there may be opportunities to pick up some bargains.

However, buyers of properties - whether for investment or occupancy - should do their homework before committing to such big-ticket items.

Here are 10 tips to keep firmly in mind.

1 CONSIDER LANDED

The executive director of HSR Property Group, Mr Eric Cheng, feels that if buyers are willing to fork out $1.2 million to $1.3million for a condominium, they should consider buying landed property instead.

Due to land scarcity in Singapore, there is always more demand than supply for landed property, which is not the case with condos, said Mr Cheng.

2 INSTALMENT RESERVE

Mr Cheng said it is important to invest within your means. Have a reserve of at least one year's worth of instalments in case of shocks, like a loss of income.

3 LEASING OR LIVING?

Mr Arvin Sylvester Lim, division director of Century 21 SHL Realty, said it is important to be sure if you plan to live in the property or rent it out.

If you are making it your home, the equation is simple: Find something that you like and can afford.

If you are looking to invest and rent out, do your research to see if there is good demand in an area, and if the rent will be enough to cover the instalment payment and still allow a profit.

4 DON'T WAIT TOO LONG

While one should hold back until one finds something ideal, Mr Lim does not encourage overspeculating on trends.

"Buying a house is not like buying a car. The moment you drive the car...the value drops, but with property the value can go up or down," he said.

Even though prices are expected to fall further, "a home is a must", Mr Lim said. He advises against pegging buying one to unpredictable market movements.

5 MAKE OFFERS FAST

Buyers who bought too many properties or can't afford to keep up with payments, given the weak economy, will be selling off their investments now, said Mr Shannan Govindarajoo, marketing manager at ERA.

He suggests you start looking and making reasonable offers as he thinks more buyers will be entering the market, which could mean prices for these "must-sell" properties may rise.

6 CHECK MASTER PLAN

Look at the Urban Redevelopment Authority's master plan and invest where the Government is pumping in money, said Mr Govindarajoo.

For instance, he thinks those interested in the Marina area should strike now, as prices are down by 40 per cent, compared to last year's.

Mr Lim said investing in property in that area will reap great returns when the integrated resort is ready as "a lot of the management staff will be living there, so rentals will be high".

7 SHOP FOR A LOAN

Banks are now becoming more cautious with making home loans and how much they are willing to lend, said Mr Govindarajoo.

He advised shopping around for a good home loan first, so that you do not commit yourself to a seller before knowing how much you have to work with.

8 PRICE VS VALUATION

Check the valuations of the property you are considering at different banks to make sure you?re getting a good deal, said Mr Govindarajoo.

9 OLDER CONDOS

Mr Parthiban Sadagopal, a Prop- Nex realtor, suggests buying a condo "between seven and 10 years old in the outskirts", like Pasir Ris or Tampines.

Judging from the trend seen after the 2003 recession, such condos are good buys for living in and investment, as you could hope to buy one at $400,000 to $500,000 now and sell it for up to $800,000 when the economy picks up.

Renting it out could fetch $3,000 a month as well.

10 DISTRICT 15

Keep your sights on the East Coast area of District 15, said Mr Cheng, as prices there are unlikely to dip drastically.

Good schools, malls and eateries add value, making it a good option for those who feel prime locations are too expensive. Meyer Road, Ceylon Road, Telok Kurau and Crane Road are some of the best places to buy a house, according to him.

Mr Govindarajoo agrees, saying District 15 is "evergreen".

Saturday, 10 January 2009

Under-estimating risks and over-confidence

One indicator that will tell us. Have you got a comprehensive WILL in place? If not, likely you have under-estimated risks and over-confidence. Wake up, my dear friends.

The ONLY THING I can guarantee you, 100%. It will CERTAINLY HAPPEN and it is matter of time, sooner or later. Either or both happening.

The day when doctor brings bad news, you about to DIE.

or

The day when police brings bad news, you have GONE.

What will happen next?

Emotional shock (certainly)

Financial shock (maybe)

We can't really mitigate emotional shock but for financial shock, we can by all means to mitigate or better to leave behind no debts.

So don't give shock, and better NOT to shock your dependents and by taking out the calculator now and compute the amount of the debts payable by them. Take care of the debts payable while you still can, if possible adequately covered by insurance.

Porperty Investing - can you swim? (Part 4)

One day , while I was fishing at the shore, a big guy came and asked me: "Brother, how is the catch?".

I replied: "Got few small fish".

He thought for a while and said: " Did you notice some big fish out there at the open sea jumping out of the seawater, why doN'T you fish there?"

"Sir, how to?", I asked

"Easy leh, I got a family boat, and I used to catch real big fish there". He said.

"Well, I got no boat ma", I answered.

"No boat arh, I know you can easily hire a sampan to fish there", he happily suggested.

"Sir, what will happen when suddenly the wind become very strong, and wave become very rough" I asked stupidly.

"No problem, my boat will be just shake wildly but will not overturn, but, your sampan may overturn. Can you swim to the shore?" he asked.

"Me, I can't eh"

So are you a STRONG SWIMMER WHO REACH THE SHORE SAFELY WHEN THE SAMPAN OVERTURN DURING STRONG WIND AND ROUGH TIDE.

Most swimmers under-estimate that they can swim safely to the shore under strong wind and rough sea. Swimmers don't drown easily in the swimming pool, but at the high sea, it is not uncommon that they might perish.

Coffee or Tea?

Sir/Madam, coffee or tea?

What will you order? coffee (stock) and tea (property)

If property sepculating or investing is your Cup of Tea, then go for Tea, or else, stay with coffee.

But, coffee drinker may sometime drink tea or convert to tea drinker.

Me. Coffee Black please.

Wednesday, 7 January 2009

Noble - waiting for you @ 1.29 before CNY




For everything there is an appointed time, even a time for every affair under the heavens: ... a time to keep quiet and a time to speak and a time to take profit.

Wait 1 month to collect your pay.
Wait 3 month to collect interest from 3-month FD.
Wait 9 month to get a baby.

Then why not wait for another few days @ 1.29 for Ang Pow money. Mr Chart not that ugly after all. Cheers!

Does 3 strikes make a good bowler?

Success is your own worst enemy. Sometime, it is just 100% LUCK that you got it right. Like bowling, I am a damn lousy bowler, but sometime due to pure LUCK, I would have a strike every now and then, I have only ONE TURKEY (3 strikes) till now and never happen again. WHY LEH?

The difference between the REAL PRO and LUCKY PRO is the consistency, the real pro will have few strikes or even turkey in almost every game; while, the lucky pro may also have some strikes but often also ending the game with none.

Same like trading or investing, a few profitable ventures does not make me a real pro, made NO MISTAKES about it. PRINTED BOLD IN MY MIND!!!!

Monday, 5 January 2009

Noble - First weekly allowance in 2009. Cheers!

Round 5:(2nd Half) ROC 12%, 27 days
Round 4:(1st Half) ROC 14%, 8 days
Round 3: ROC 7.1%, 8 days
Round 2: ROC 31.6%, 20 days
Round 1: ROC 16.3%, 28 days

Sunday, 4 January 2009

Feeling of financial abundance?

How do I know I am ready for the one CARD BIG POKER GAME? Probably, one way is to look inside me, do I have the feeling of financial adundance?

How?

Q1. When ordering food from the Menu indicating Market Price, do I check what is the Market Price before ordering? (i.e. not prepared or willingness to pay Market Price)

Q2. When shopping and came across something interesting, but after looking at the price tag, put it back IMMEDIATELY, and start looking at something else?

What is the answer to Q1, and Q2?

A1. Always. Probably, I am not ready for one CARD BIG POKER GAME.

A2. Not frequent. Congralutions. I am certainly READY lor.

As with any Indicator, there is no one right indicator. Cheers!

Property Investing - doing the Math (Part 3)

I have sensed that some of those superfriends are getting ready to invest in property. I presume investing in Sinagpore 99 years Leasehold property as investing in Freehold property would need huge capital and highly leveraged.

What is 99 years Leasehold?
A leasehold estate is an ownership interest in land in which a lessee or a tenant holds real property by some form of title from a lessor or landlord. Leasehold is a form of property tenure where one party buys the right to occupy land or a building for a given length of time i.e. 99 years.

What work against an investor?
Time decay. Yes, time decay works against any investor (value investing).The property will likely to go through a few property cycles, finally, the full impact of Time Decay will be signicifantly felt in the last cycle and will be rapidly priced in and its value will plummet without no futher recovery i.e. approaching End of Life.

Is putting money in 99 years Leasehold property Investment or Speculation?

I think Investing is the most abusive word used by Investors in Singapore 99 years Leasehold property.(You should never ever think you are an investor if what you are doing is in fact speculation)

Leasehold property is good for living and for those who could afford a luxury living. By all means, live well, enjoy it, and spent your natural wealth in your lifetime. Never heard of anyone who has successfuly bring their wealth with them after their lifetime, most likely their wealth will be stolen or lost after sometime.

So are you still INVESTING OR SPECULATING? Leave it for you to answer truthfully. Alternatively, loading property counters bringing you nearer to INVESTING as there is no TIME DECAY element. Cheers!

Speculation vs Investment

Investment or Value Investing is which I believe is the most abusive word in using money to make money.

A speculator is someone that buys something only because he/she thinks someone else will pay more for it in the near future, as opposed to an investor, who buys things because analysis confirms that the investment is of high quality and/or good value, and worth holding.

A speculator buys things because he/she believes a less informed person (A Greater Fool) will buy it off them later at a higher price, an investor buys things because they promise both a return on capital invested, as well as a return of capital invested..

--------------------------------------
To add on with some interesting extract from the Net...

Benjamin Graham, a famous investor in his own right and also notable because he is the man that taught Warren Buffett to invest, defined the difference between speculation and investment in this famous passage from his book The Intelligent Investor

Professional speculators are like professional gamblers. There are people out there who play blackjack or poker for a living, taking calculated risks with enormous amounts of money, seeking to maximise their edge with sophisticated techniques and a mind that is well tuned to probabilities and risks vs rewards. Some of them make millions, there is no doubt at all that by playing a game with statistical biases, and seeking over time to take profits from these biases, one can actually make a living from gambling.

On the other hand, the world is full of the social wreckage caused by gambling. The unwise and impatient litter the wayside, though there is no shortage of people willing to take their place. You can only profit from gambling when your probability of winning is greater than the probability of the other side winning, and casinos employ gifted mathematicians to make sure the rules of the game favour the house.

Professional speculators are as far above the public in terms of sheer talent, dedication and intelligence as professional gamblers are above the tipsy chain-smoking denizens of the casino floor.

To become a professional speculator you have to live and breathe the market you want to speculate in. All those people buying collectible china and antiques are up against the true connoisseurs. Those who know the market from the inside, and can spot a rare gem when it comes along, and have the cash needed to buy it, and the body of experience to know exactly what this item is worth (regardless of how aesthetically pleasing or otherwise that it may be).

Professional traders think of little else. Far from the 5-minute-a-day business that is advertised by the guru wannabes that advertise "systems", trading is a lifestyle that can be embraced by only a rare person. Traders become aware of all the pertinent fundamental information, including consensus estimates and bullish/bearish market sentiment.

Professional speculators in mining issues read all the trade journals in mining and probably know a thing or two about how to read the jargon of the analytical chemist in the labs and the geologist breaking rocks, or the meaning of the various exotic electronic sensing devices used today. A technology speculator needs to know a thing or two about science, engineering and electronics as well, so as to keep up with the state-of-the-art and separate the good ideas from the blue sky ideas.

A trader doesn't always try to forecast though. The blackjack player does not need a newsletter writer to tell him what card will be next so he just plays the probabilities and tries to control his risk, usually with some kind of mathematically based money management system. Similarly in stocks and futures, few traders know or care what the market is going to do next. They sit back, do their analysis and try to think in terms of possible upside potential and downside risk, determine where they might enter the market and where they will exit if the market should move the opposite way.

Can you do this? Well sure, there is nothing to stop someone from picking up these kinds of skills, but you won't do that by subscribing to any newsletter, or paying a thousand dollars for some kind of formula or indicator that some guy says will tell you when to buy and sell. Not that there aren't plenty of people who do sell such things though, in investment more than anything else there are plenty of people who demand such a service. Everyone wants to know what the experts think about the future direction of the market, while nothing like it appears in the newspapers, surely someone that works in an investment bank knows what is going on, or a fund manager, or some sort of pro?

To every demand there will rise a supply to meet it. Since there are no genuine and ethical people who can give an easy answer, the void can (and is) only filled with players that exploit the gullibility and ignorance of their customers.

A businessman does not seek advice on how to run his business, except in a general sense or perhaps get an expert with certain management talents who can fix a specific problem. You don't get anyone offering a service though where complete businesses are offered and you are told how to run them and it all takes only a few minutes of time per day once you pay them your money. (Except maybe for franchise businesses, but there is no parallel between a franchise and speculation, so forget it!) To those professional speculators, speculating is their business, their full time job. Most put in considerably more hours into their trading than the average person puts into their job, and unless you really love trading you certainly don't find yourself any better off as a trader.

The reality is that you can make money as a professional speculator, but it is not at all easy. No one can tell you how to do it specifically, they can only give a small amount of guidance while you have to do a huge amount of work. Traders work very hard at their trading, doing enormous amounts of research and keeping track of a huge amount of information. Don't even consider becoming a very serious trader unless that is all you want to do. Most newsletter gurus aren't traders at all, they advise on methods they have developed with only theoretical simulated testing. It is very time consuming writing a newsletter, and even more so trading. As gurus have just as many hours in their day as the rest of us, it is clear that the lifestyle they paint, with their luxury houses and heaps of free time, holidays in exotic locations and massive incomes is entirely incompatible with that of a professional trader. Not that traders haven't written books, there are a few good ones around, but one thing that is for sure is that no genuine trader would have the time to write, edit and publish a weekly newsletter.

Don't give up your day job if you aren't already a trader. You can start out with it by riding a few uptrends on some large cap stocks, despite what they say about trading being hard it doesn't take a genius to buy BHP when it has been steadily rising for a week or two on the back of improving commodity prices, and sell a week later at a 20% profit. If you did that and you really enjoyed it, and I mean REALLY enjoyed the market then maybe you might have the passion.

Traders get out of bed at 6am to see the close of a foreign market and the opening of another one, they read all the journals (not the tip sheets, I mean reputable financial newspapers) and track a number of markets. They watch out for opportunities and they are fast in taking them, and equally fast in getting out if they turn out to be wrong. They don't necessarily use the super-duper software or subscribe to a $1,000 a month data service for NASDAQ day traders, but they are in there anyway, around the newsgroups and reading all the commentary (sometimes so they can go contrarian when strong consensus is obvious).

Why do traders do this? Well of course there is the money, though not as many as you would think make a very high income, they do it because they love doing it. They find the vacillations of the market to be entirely fascinating and immersive, they gain pleasure from seeing the market move with them, but don't take it personally when it doesn't so they get out quickly. They don't trade to live, they live to trade. Far from the glamourous operator pulling up to the curb in a Maclaren F1 sports car to attend a society social event, many traders are reclusive, sometimes a little nutty and definitely obsessed. Trading is their favourite thing in the whole wide world, they would not want to take a yacht to the Bahamas, as that would drag them away from their trading.

Will you be able to buy that kind of intensity? Can a software package that scans the market for some sort of trigger signal provide you with the kind of skill and knowledge to keep up with those guys? Will a $10 a minute hotline to some guru really provide the insights you need? Bear in mind that a real trader would be too busy to talk to you during market hours, and would not welcome a bunch of whining beginners desperate for some tips. Can a few lessons turn you into a virtuoso?

At least with music you don't go broke if you don't play well at first, you have the chance to practice for many years before you get your night in the spotlight. Even paper trading isn't real practice, unless you have real money in the market you will always kid yourself, thinking as hindsight rolls in that in the real thing you would not have taken that trade at all because it was so obvious it wouldn't have worked. No!

On the other hand, investment isn't a particularly hard thing to do. Anyone, regardless of intrinsic talent can do it. The stock market has a certain long term return that beats inflation comfortably. Purchases of a conservative portfolio of leading stocks will provide returns along the same lines as the market, even better (sometimes) you could buy units in an index tracker fund. Purchasing ordinary real estate in an attractive area that has enjoyed consistent gains for decades is also a good investment, and again requires no special skill.

Is investment better than speculation? Well you won't make massive profits in a few days if you are investing, but you make respectable profits in time. Speculators don't always lose money, but the inept ones do. There is nothing inherently superior about either approach, though one thing that is for certain is that only a minute proportion of the population will ever (or could ever) be highly successful speculators, you rely on being much better than 99% of other people and you have to maintain that superiority for as long as you speculate. On the other hand, if every single person in the world was an investor, it would simply mean that wealth would be fairly and equitably shared, with all sharing in the prosperity that can be gained by living in a capitalist society.

I am not against speculation, but when I speculate I do so knowing the difference between speculation and investment. Trouble arises when people confuse the two and look for hot tips to invest.

You should never ever think you are an investor if what you are doing is in fact speculation. You can be both, but not at the same time (not with the same stock anyway, though you can have two portfolios if you want to).

There are of course differing definitions of speculation. An efficient market theorist will define investment as holding a large diversified (but otherwise randomly chosen) portfolio that will give returns commensurate with the market as a whole. It defines speculation as any attempt to beat this by analysis of any form, including technical, fundamental or otherwise.

Others define speculation by the knowledgability of the investor, but this is not a very useful definition really. The dictionary defines speculation as attempting to profit from market price appreciations, this is definitely the most useful definition.

You are probably an investor if:

You are buying a portfolio of quality issues at a reasonable price.

You either content yourself with returns that are average for the investment type, or focus on the best value issues of the type for superior returns. The portfolio is made up of issues with a strong track record, or is managed by people with a strong track record.

You can justify your purchase with reasonable projections of profits that are not out of line with historical returns for ventures of this type.

You buy something because the price has fallen so the yield (dividend, rent or otherwise) has risen to the point that it is superior to alternative investments, and you have substantial reason to believe that the investment won't completely go bust.

You buy because you notice the stock is trading at a price below fundamental valuations.

You sell because of deteriorating fundamentals in the investment, or you need the cash for something meeting your buy criteria even more closely. Market quotations are there only for your convenience, you may choose to sell if the investment looks absurdly expensive, or to buy when you see the opposite, but other than that you ignore volatility.

You keep a close eye on those who manage your investments (including managers of the company you hold shares in), looking for prudence, logical capital allocation and conservative expansion. You would rather not invest with a high profile celebrity CEO that promises huge growth with a series of rapid takeovers.


You are probably a good speculator if:

You understand the risk and are taking positive measures to limit that risk. In fact risk management is your bread and butter.

You are taking steps to bring about a higher return than average by keeping a close eye on your stocks and constantly riding the ups in price but selling out and waiting for the end to the downs.

Of the many issues you are watching this one seems to have the highest probability of doing well over the time frame of your trading style.

You anticipate a price increase but have a plan in place in case it doesn't.

You track a large amount of information that may have an effect on prices, and get ready to act if this information doesn't seem to be already reflected in the price.

You are well tuned with the pulse of the market you are in, and ready to leave before the herd does.

You buy at the early signs of upturn after the price has fallen, but are ready to close your position rapidly of you turn out to be wrong.

You are mindful of the overall trend in prices.

You buy the best value investment of its type during a boom.

You buy something with the strongest upward price momentum.

You sell because you notice a trend change.

Market quotations are your bread and butter, you want the very latest information and lots of it.

You don't trust anyone else with your money, the stupid cattle on the opposite side of the trade from you don't know what they are missing and all those gurus are just crooks.

You are probably a mug speculator if:

You verbally acknowledge risk but ignore it, allocating a large proportion of your money to this one venture.

Risk management simply amounts to nodding your head saying you realise that there is of course a risk, but doing absolutely nothing to take steps to limit, or even properly identify risk.

You are trying to bring about a very high return by buying something that looks exciting, but you aren't too sure how the business works.

You are buying something because someone you know told you it was good.

You have absolutely no idea what else is out there because you haven't really checked, but this one looks good.

You think it is a sure thing to go up.


You buy something that has fallen a lot because you don't think the price can go any lower.

You find out the price crashed a week after it happens in a conversation with your friend that "understands this sort of thing".

Rene Rivkin says on TV that he "likes it a lot" so you buy it.

You don't understand how people make money in the investment.

You are trying to pick the very bottom to buy, or the exact top to sell.

You will pay anything for an investment because prices are booming.

You buy because it has gone up a lot.

You sell because you want to take a profit.

Rises in the price excite you, but as terrifying as it is to you, you don't take any action during the dips because it is just a "paper loss" and you know it isn't really a loss unless you sell. If it gets back in the black though you'll rapidly sell out and pocket the cash so you won't lose face over it.

You want someone to tell you what to buy next, and even though the last 20 newsletters you subscribed to cost you lots of money, you haven't quite given up on newsletters just yet, you also own the latest and greatest automatic software to free you from all that dull boring analysis.

Saturday, 3 January 2009

SUFFERING, NOT SMILING, The Truth About Captive Dolphins

SUFFERING, NOT SMILING, The Truth About Captive Employees who work for their daily bread. If not for this daily bread, they may have choose to do other jobs that close to their passion.

Thursday, 1 January 2009

PREPARING FOR THE DEATH OF A LOVED ONE

When a person enters the final stage of the dying process, two different dynamics are at work, which are closely interrelated and interdependent. On the physical plane, the body begins the final process of shutting down, which will end when all the physical systems cease to function. Usually this is an orderly and un-dramatic progressive series of physical changes which are not medical emergencies requiring invasive interventions.

These physical changes are a normal, natural way in which the body prepares itself to stop, and the most appropriate kinds of responses are comfort and enhancing measures.

The other dynamic of the dying process is a work on the emotional, spiritual, and mental planes and is a different kind of process. The “spirit” of the dying person begins the final process of release from the body, its immediate environment, and all attachments. This release from the body has its own priorities, which include the resolution of whatever is unfinished of a practical nature, reconciliation of close relationships, and reception of permission to “let go” from family members.

These “events” are the normal natural way in which the spirit prepares to move from this materialistically oriented realm of existence into the next dimension of life. The most appropriate kinds of response to the emotional, spiritual and mental changes are those which support and encourage this release and transition.

When a person’s body is ready and wanting to stop, but the person is still unresolved or un-reconciled over some important issue or with some significant relationship, he or she will tend to linger… even though very uncomfortable or debilitated… in order to finish whatever needs finishing.

On the other hand, when a person is emotionally, spiritually, and mentally resolved and ready for this release, but his / her body has not completed its final physical process, the person will continue to live until the physical shut down is completed.

The experience we call death occurs when the body completes its natural process of
shutting down and the “spirit” completes its natural process of reconciling and finishing.

These two processes need to happen in a way appropriate for the values, beliefs, and lifestyle of the dying person so the death can occur as a peaceful release.



Adapted from THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE
CARE July / August 1992.
Revised 12/01/98

Preparing for Death

To think of and prepare for death is not surrender, but victory over fear
If you are like most, you may be a bit squeamish when it comes to the subject of death. Most likely, it is something you would rather not think about. However, blocking the thought of death from one's mind is a mistake. Those who choose to suppress thoughts of death can never realize their full potential. For it is only when we admit that death is an arrow in flight coming our way that we are motivated to act now. When we pretend to ourselves that death couldn't possibly come today, but must be lurking at a distant point in the future, we falsely believe there is no need to act immediately. Who do you suppose are the great achievers: those who are ever aware of the nearness of death or those with their heads in the sand?

Because of death, life has value. When you realize that those you love can be taken from you at any moment, you cherish them all the more. It is death that makes life such a valuable gift. When one offers their own life to protect their country or family, there's no greater gift. Those who work as volunteers, helping others, are offering part of their lives. And because life is limited, the time they spend serving others is a precious gift.

When we face death, rather than hide from it, we develop the courage to accomplish anything. After all, if we don't fear death, what remains to frighten us? That's why Paul Tillich writes, "It is man only who is able to face his death consciously; that belongs to his greatness and dignity." Also, our problems are easier to accept when we realize the only people without difficulties are those in the cemetery. Contemplating death is like bungee jumping, it makes life exhilarating and leads to a heightened sense of aliveness. Since we will all die, it makes sense to make our final moments as peaceful as possible. How do we do this? Let Leonardo Da Vinci explain: "As a well-spent day brings happy sleep, so life well used brings happy death." And it is only by constantly being aware of death that we will have a life well used.

Don't misunderstand. When I suggest we should be constantly aware of death, I'm not referring to a morbid fascination or obsession with death. The focus of our attention is not on death, but on living. However, while living, we maintain an awareness of death in the background, and use it to guide us in doing good. For example, a friend does something stupid and hurtful. How should I react? Should I get angry with him? An awareness of death allows me to marvel at the miracle of life, understand its frailty, and realize my friend or I may die at any moment. So, shouldn't I cherish our relationship and overlook his flaws? Should I get angry with him? No, of course not! Maybe what he did today was stupid, but he'll learn. Besides, tomorrow I may be the one doing something stupid.

But how can we practice being aware of death when the mere thought of the subject sends a chill down our spine? The secret is to become aware of and analyze our fears, for they melt under the bright light of scrutiny. One reason we fear death is because of our instinct for self-preservation. If you are afraid of crossing a dangerous intersection, your fear makes you more alert and cautious, which is good. This fear only crops up when you are exposed to danger, so it shouldn't interfere when contemplating death. However, the following examples do prevent some people from practicing an awareness of death.

1) Perhaps our biggest fear is annihilation, extinction, or disappearance of our identity. Isn't life all we have? So, its loss is the greatest loss we can suffer. But it only appears that way because we are too caught up in ourselves, too much in love with ourselves. If we step back, we will realize the universe doesn't revolve around us, but we revolve with it. Enjoy the ride! Redirect your love from yourself to the universe. Do this and you won't be disappointed. For even though you and I will go, the universe will still be here. Does any one rose, snowflake, or cherry blossom have more value, significance, or meaning than another? What makes you think we are any different? Each one of us is just another wave in the ocean of life. Relax. Don't take things so seriously. For as Norman Cousins wrote, "Death is not the greatest loss in life. The greatest loss is what dies inside us while we live."
2) Many of us were taught about life after death, but are uncertain about the outcome, so we're afraid. This is simply fear of the unknown. If you believe in life after death, the solution is simple. Lead the good life and you'll receive your reward. If it turns out you were wrong and there is no afterlife, you won't know about your mistake, so there's no point in worrying about it.

3) A common concern is fear of suffering. However, this is not fear of death, but fear of the dying process. We are dying now; it's just a little more obvious near the end of our lives. There is no need to fear death since you will never experience it. As long as you are dying, you are still living. That's the paradox. As far as fear of suffering at the end, instead of wasting your energy with useless fear and worry, apply that energy to maintaining a healthy physical, mental, and spiritual life. At least that will make the end easier to bear.

4) Some fear that death proves all our efforts were meaningless. Don't believe it! Don't I often quote the words of wise men who lived 2,500 years ago? Imagine, they've been dead so long and their words are still being quoted. Their lives were not meaningless! Believe it or not, even the lives of ordinary folk, such as you and I, have impact on the world. During our lifetimes, our words and actions directly and indirectly affect thousands of people. Our actions produce ripples that stretch out to eternity. Are our lives meaningless? Not a chance!

"Perhaps the whole root of our trouble," James Baldwin wrote, "the human trouble, is that we will sacrifice all the beauty of our lives, will imprison ourselves in totems, taboos, crosses, blood sacrifices, steeples, mosques, races, armies, flags, nations, in order to deny the fact of death, which is the only fact we have." Well, life may be a candle in the wind, but, oh, it gives such a lovely light!

© Chuck Gallozzi
For more articles and contact information,
Visit http://www.personal-development.com/chuck

Noble - Getting harder to play lor??

Wealth and Happiness

Some taking from an article from Gary Hayden in MIND Your Body, Jan 1, 2009

Learning from one of history's great teacher on wealth and happiness - St Thomas Aquinas (125-1274), a Dominican monk blessed with an extra ordinary brilliant mind and remembered everything he had read, so that his mind was like a huge library.

He believed that happiness is man's ultimate goal, the one thing we seek entirely for its own sake. Happiness is about more than just feeling good. It is about living a good and meaningful life. We all seek happiness. However, Aquinas warned us that we need to be clear about this involves for we may otherwise seek in vain. Everyday, we are presented with conflicting goods from which we must choose. However, which lead to happiness and which lead to frustration and disappointment. Some people pursue what Aquinas termed "external goods" like wealth, power or fame. (ho ho, create wealth, this is what I pursue)

Whether man's happiness consists in wealth?

It is impossible for man's happiness to consist in wealth. For wealth is twofold, as the Philosopher says (Polit. i, 3), viz. natural and artificial.

Natural wealth is that which serves man as a remedy for his natural wants: such as food, drink, clothing, cars, dwellings, and such like, while artificial wealth is that which is not a direct help to nature, as money, but is invented by the art of man, for the convenience of exchange, and as a measure of things salable.

Now it is evident that man's happiness cannot consist in natural wealth. For wealth of this kind is sought for the sake of something else, viz. as a support of human nature: consequently it cannot be man's last end, rather is it ordained to man as to its end. Wherefore in the order of nature, all such things are below man, and made for him, according to Psalm 8:8: "Thou hast subjected all things under his feet."

And as to artificial wealth, it is not sought save for the sake of natural wealth; since man would not seek it except because, by its means, he procures for himself the necessaries of life. Consequently much less can it be considered in the light of the last end. Therefore it is impossible for happiness, which is the last end of man, to consist in wealth.

In addition, those hinger after riches are never satisfied. They quickly come to despise what they posses and yearn instead for other things. So happiness cannot consist in wealth.

The problem, as Aquinas saw it, is desire. We humans can never be truly happy until all our appetities are fulfilled. So long as there is something left for us to desire, we will never be completely satisfied.

Aquinas concluded that no created goods can satisfy our desire since all created goods are necessarily imperfect. Therefore, perfect happiness is unattainable in this life.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adding my thoughts...

To reduce the level of desires by living as simply as possible, and bringing us nearer to lesser imperfect happiness. Sometime, we do see some people causing themselves unhappiness by seeking perfection in man created goods e.g. music, wines, food, houses, car, woman, etc. Never seems to be satisfy with the finest wine, the best music, the most tasty food, house and car are never big enough, and woman never prettier and more sexy. Look at newspaper's ads everyday, they are shouting at some ladies and even men, never seem to be satisfy and happy with your natural head, face, hair, body and parts.

So be happy and won't worry. Cheers!

Wednesday, 31 December 2008

The Goal of the End Game - Financial Independence

The goal of the End Game is to accumulate enough wealth for you and your family to stop.

Having enough is more important than having more. If you've reached enough, you don't want to be gambling for more. Stop putting your wealth at risk. Stop the gambling and risk taking with investments of any kind. You would finally have enough money and personal power to walk away from the investing game and spend the rest of your life doing something else!

When exactly do you reach the End Game?

When you have enough principal invested safely for your after tax-income to match or exceed your annual expenses on an ongoing basis. This would include budgeting for the lifestyle you truly want.

-----------------------------------------------------------

So I reach there on time and on target or will I be late? Tomorrow is the new beginning ....

--------------------------------------------------------------

"Human beings, by changing the inner attitudes of their minds, can change the outer aspects of their lives." - William James

Who Took My Wealth?



Loss of -34.2% of nett worth. From the high of 93.2% to close at 58.98% for 2008.

Who Took My Weath?

No 1. Success can be one of life's worst enemies. It engenders overconfidence and, as a result, one tends to let one's guard down - in some instances, to the extent of recklessness

I have met my worst enemies in 2007, and failed to recognize them sooner, and thus the downfall in 2008. I have previously survived two major corrections with heavy losses and recovered with even more nett profits. But, this Bear killed.

No 2. Leverage

I use a wheelbarrow to lift more dirt than I can carry by myself, I am employing leverage. Leverage involves using a tool to increase my power. That tool is Contra Trading, the tool of leverage is "no upfront money". Just loaded up.

But, I have put too much dirt into a wheelbarrow, and broke my back trying to lift it. Too highly leveraged, and did not have enough cushioning to hold out and when the market turned against me and forced me into liquidation — game over.


Going forward, I WILL ONLY LIFT dirt with my two bare hands. Trade and survive like an American Cockroach. Eat when there is food to be found, and can survive without water for 1 month and without food for 3 months. Goodbye 2008, Welcome 2009. More food to be found. Cheers.

Sunday, 28 December 2008

Propert Investing - doing the math (Part II)

me & my money, invest, Dec 28, 2008, thesundaytimes,

It is always at the back of my mind. If I have a lump sum and without doing any leverage, should I be doing stock or property investing? To be or not to be is the question?

Today, in thesundaytimes, we have this article from the property whiz .

Let look at Syed's property gain as follows:

Bought Sold Capital Profit Total% Years Annualized%
1997 2003 $345,000 $100,000 29% 6 4.8%
1986 1989 $230,000 $100,000 43% 3 14.5%
2005 2008 $430,000 $100,000 23% 3 7.8%

Just doing the math, there is nothing fantastic to shout about on these annualized ROC.

Is this true that on average, the risks of investing in property are understated and returns from investing in property are overstated. I believe so.

The most difficult part in stock investing is the emotional roller coastal ride of watching the value of your portfolio dropping by hours if not by days.

But, not for property as the pricing of residential property is infrequent and informal. Property investors never see red ink on a statement unless it is on the day of the sale. And most property investors never formally evaluate the performance of their investments at all. Imagine if you looked in a newspaper at the price of your home each day, just as you do with the price of your shares. Your attitude to risk would most likely be quite different.

Do you hear the guy going home to tell his wife: "Honey, jialiat liao, our home value drops by 50%". But, when your portfolio value drop by 50%, probably, that guy will say to his wife: "Honey, jialiat liao, you need to cut down your Christmas shopping by 70%".

Some will argue that property value will NEVER drop to ZERO, and companies can go bankrupt. But, surely, there are some blue chips that will not go bankrupt, as govt will certainly step in to rescue them as they are too critical to fail and will cause chaos to the country.

Likewise, property value will NEVER be a multi bagger as the govt will certainly step in to COOL IT DOWN before the country goes into riots.

Look at Hyflux, a $20K company with 3 staff grew into company of market cap of over $1B.

For property value to appreciate, it is true that a GREATER FOOL needs to appear, but it is not always true for a stock as the company can really grow big; e.g. Hyflux. Can the property grow over time????? from 2 rooms to 5 rooms???? No. But a GREATER FOOL must come and happy to pay much more.

Investor is very comfortable in dumping $500K into one property, but, to dump $500K into the stocks will be a nerve breaking experience. Investing in property require probably one off of real hard work, but for stock investing, it is endless chores of stocks picking, and heartbreaking at times when the stock plummet minutes after you have bought them.

So it is ALL IN THE INVESTORS MIND. Finally, INVESTING is still a Game of Strategy and Emotional Management. Choose your best strategy and emotions that fit you. It is ONLY YOU THAT COUNTS.

Other related articles:

http://createwealth8888.blogspot.com/2008/12/property-investing-doing-math.html

http://createwealth8888.blogspot.com/2008/12/investing-in-property-may-be-less.html

http://createwealth8888.blogspot.com/2008/11/assets-in-your-portfolio.html

Saturday, 27 December 2008

So You Think You Can Trade?

You can have anything you want if you want it desperately enough. You must want it with an exuberance that erupts through the skin and joins the energy that created the world… Martha Graham (1894-1991; fierce, innovative dancer and choreographer)
OK — I fudged the title of this post from the TV series called “So You Think You Can Dance?”

Dr. Janice Dorn
The Trading Doctor


Having been a dancer since age 5, I actually thought I could dance! That was before I watched these amazing young dancers battling it out week after week; one by one, falling down, getting up, getting safe and getting booted. The field continues to narrow until, one day soon, the winner will be chosen. These people have talent, training and experience. So what separates the winners from the losers? Passion, commitment and discipline. That is what separates the winners from the losers in dancing, life and trading.

Why do so many people think they can do something with confidence, courage and competence when they cannot? The so-called overconfidence bias and other cognitive (thinking) biases are topics for another day. Today, I would like to focus on the Learning Ladder of Trading.


One day, you get up and realize that you are in a dead-end job, and just sick and tired of being sick and tired. Your buddy has been trading the markets for a few years and doing OK…not great...but getting by. Your buddy's buddy just set up a trading account, paid thousands for software, books and courses, but is not making any money.

In fact, he has lost half of his initial stake. Yet, you hear others touting returns of 100-1000 percent gains a year, and the siren call of greed coupled with the idea that if they can do it, you can do it better, is too tempting to resist. I mean, how difficult can it be? You just buy the right books, get the best software, go to the right seminars, subscribe to the hottest newsletter, and--with the click, click of your mouse--buy low and sell high or buy high and sell higher or sell high and buy lower. No problem. Piece of cake.

So, you announce to your family that you are going to quit your job, become a full time trader, monies will flow effortless into your account and everything is going to change. It all seems so easy, and the seminar people are doing it, so why can't you. You are just as intelligent as the next guy.

This type of thinking borders on the delusional. Just as one cannot wake up one day and announce that one, without any formal education training (including the school of hard knocks) is going to start practicing law or medicine, one does not become a proficient trader overnight. Get over yourself, because it just isn't going to happen.

No matter how many bells, whistles, indicators, seminars and books with which you surround yourself, you have to pay your dues. You must learn that that piece of cake needs to be converted into humble pie, and that the most-successful traders got that way by first getting a Ph.D. in losses.

Trading is simple, but it is not easy. Trading is a skill and an art that takes time, patience, perseverance and courage. Successful trading and investing are skills, which combine both art and science. In order to achieve and master these skills, one must progress on a path, which is mental, emotional, physical and spiritual. For many, this is the most difficult journey ever taken. Start where you are, and understand that it is about the process, that it takes time and that the rewards are worth it if you just keep going with passion. Without passion, why bother?

There are no secrets to success. It is the result of preparation, hard work, and learning from failure… Colin L. Powell

Every trader must climb the four rungs of the Ladder of Learning, and must do this one step at a time. You cannot skip a step, but if you let your guard down, do not continue to study and practice, you can and will fall down a step or two.

What do I mean by the Ladder of Learning and the four steps? In this case (and putting other learning theories and the neuroanatomical bases for them aside for now) I am referring specifically to the four stages of trading competence:
Somewhere in your make-up, there lies sleeping, the seed of achievement which, if aroused and put into action, would carry you to heights such as you may never have hoped to attain… Napoleon Hill

(1) Unconscious Incompetence: You don't know that you don't know, and you don't know what you don't know, a.k.a. ignorance is bliss.

At this stage of your trading, you are not aware of the existence of, or need for, specific trading skills. You don’t know what you don’t know, including that you have any deficiencies (since you don't know that there are any specific trading skills). Denial may come into play here as well, as you may think that such skills are unnecessary or not useful, and all you have to do is to subscribe to a service or hotline, or jump on the next "hot" pick and money will come rolling into your account. In order to move to the next stage, you most overcome your denial and become consciously aware of your incompetence. Without taking this next step, you will not progress and no new skill will be acquired. There will be no learning. The next step is:

(2) Conscious Incompetence: You know that you don't know, but you are not entirely sure what you don't know.

At this stage, you become aware that trading is a skill, which exists, which is practiced by many and is relevant to your success. You also become aware of your deficiencies in this area by attempting to trade or practicing how to trade. This is the stage in which you begin to figure out how much you don't know. Successful traders will, at some point during this stage of the learning process, make a commitment to learn. They will make a commitment to study, to be teachable and to practice, practice and practice until you know what you don’t know. Now, you are ready to progress to:

(3) Conscious Competence: You know what you know, and you can trade, but you have to think about it.

During this stage, the skill of trading can be performed reliably, consistently and at will. However, you have to concentrate a lot, and think a lot, in order to do it. It is not second nature, nor is it automatic. At this stage, you are open totally to more learning, but you are not able to teach anyone else how to do it. The only way to proceed from this stage to the final stage is to practice more and more until— eureka — one day you have reached the stage of:

(4) Unconscious Competence: You know how to do it, and don't have to think about it. You just do it.

At this stage, the act and process of trading consolidates within the memory and pattern recognition areas of your brain…it becomes second nature. If you are really good at it, you can trade and do other things at the same time (I do not recommend this, however). Certain people at this stage are capable of teaching others, but this is not universal. In fact, it may be more difficult to teach at this stage since the skill has become largely instinctual. It is at this stage when, if someone asks you how you knew to do that, you have to pause, think and say, "I don't really know. I just did it." This is trading mastery.

There is another, final and rarely-discussed stage that is called Conscious Unconscious Competence. Those who have reached this stage are the best teachers, and they are rare and difficult to find. Find one of these people to guide and support you if you really want to learn how to trade.

Champions execute the fundamentals with unconscious competence. That means they've practiced the moves so many times in the past that they can do them almost perfectly without thinking about it. When you can perform brilliantly without thinking, you can perform at a very high level…June Jones (Head Football Coach, University of Hawaii Warriors)

Noble - Getting difficult to play?

Friday, 26 December 2008

Tales of fortunes made and lost in recessions

Success can be one of life's worst enemies. It engenders overconfidence and, as a result, one tends to let one's guard down - in some instances, to the extent of recklessness

(Createwealth has met his worst enemies in 2007, and failed to recognize them sooner, and thus the downfall in 2008)

By TEH HOOI LING
SENIOR CORRESPONDENT

MARKET crashes are the greatest redistributor of wealth. This has been true of previous crashes. But in the current turmoil, there are few beneficiaries, a friend noted. It is more a great destruction of wealth on a global scale so far.


A recession is a good time to start a business as costs are low. Disney, Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard, Oracle and Cisco are some of the companies that were founded in downturns.

Well, okay, some short-sellers may have profited from some of their trades. But many get wiped out in their next trade. Perhaps it is those who are not invested at all and who have the cash to pick through the carnage in the next few years who will really come out ahead. Who knows? Nobody is certain of anything anymore.

A lot of people have been hit hard this time around. There are a few reasons for this. One, prior to this, we've had four years of a bull market where prices had gone in only one direction.

Success, notes a friend, is one of life's worst enemies. It engenders overconfidence and, as a result, one tends to let down one's guard - in some instances, to the extent of recklessness. Economist Hyman Minsky sees the cycle of risk-taking in the economy as following a pattern: stability and absence of crises encourage risk-taking, complacency, and lowered awareness of the possibility of problems.

But even for those who are conservative and have their heads centred and feet firmly planted on the ground, the economics just a few months back suggested that being invested was the right course of action. Then, inflation was running at 5 or 6 per cent and banks' interest rates were at less than one per cent.

For someone who didn't want to have his or her purchasing power eroded, keeping the money in the bank wasn't the most logical of options. Which was why a lot of people are invested - and, worse, a lot took loans to invest. If the borrowing cost was so low, and one was expecting to make a return higher than that cost of borrowing, it made sense to borrow.

Of course, we know now that a lot of people had underestimated or even ignored the risk of trying to earn those extra percentage points of returns.

A friend shared with me some of the horrendous stories of how an enormous amount of wealth was destroyed in the last few months.

Up till last year, one man had $100 million of his worth in only one stock. Towards the end of last year, that stock started to decline. By early this year, the stock was down more than 50 per cent from its peak just a few months before.

The man picked up quite a few additional shares - on margin - thinking that the stock had bottomed and would eventually rebound. Since then, the stock has plunged by another 80 per cent. The $100 million is more than wiped out! The stock is Cosco Corp, which went from 10 cents in March 2003 to $8.20 in October last year - an 82 times jump. It is now trading at less than 70 cents.

Another guy had relatively much more modest means. His net worth was estimated at $2-3 million. He heard from 'reliable' sources that a particular company would be taken over by another at a significantly higher price than the stock's then market price. He bet all he had and, if I remember correctly, also took margin financing to buy that stock. The stock was FerroChina, which has since been suspended because it had run out of money to pay its suppliers and debtors.

One value investor thought Thailand was cheap a few years back. One particular company, a very big one, was trading at 1.2 baht - significantly below its book value. The investor concentrated his bet on that company. And, indeed, the market began to recognise the value of the company and the stock tripled to over 3 baht.

The value investor's portfolio grew to $26 million. In the last year or so, the stock has plunged to below 0.7 baht. The investor is now down some 50 per cent on his original capital.

Another man was shrewd enough to think that the market was overvalued towards the end of 2007. So he got out of the market, and even shorted it. He was happy that the market went the way he predicted. He was the smartest guy in town.

By June or July, thinking that the market had fallen enough, he loaded up on shares. Like the guys above, he too used margin financing to pick up the shares. As we know, the market took an even more severe turn in September and October. He too was dealt a severe blow.

A friend was also bearish about the market towards the end of last year. He had put in some shorts. Then last October, the market went on to hit record highs. He lost his resolve, and reversed his trades and got hit as well.

Another made quite a bit of money in the Singapore market. His confidence grew. He wanted a bigger stage. He bought US shares on margin. US stocks took a precipitous plunge a few months back. He has had a few rounds of margin calls.

A young banker in his late 20s made $2-3 million from the property market in the last few years. He ploughed all the profits into a $10 million property, and took loans of some $7 million. He's now saddled with a mortgage payment of some $30,000 a month.

Many of the real-life examples above show just how lethal leverage can be. In a rising market, leverage is your friend; in a down market, the blow dealt by leverage can knock one out for good.

Perhaps another lesson is to always take some profit off the table. Today, the valuations of stocks are at levels unseen in years, if not decades. 'It is at times like these, when there is a lot of fear, that one can make three or four times return on your capital,' a friend said.

Yes, we all know that. But so far this year, every time one thinks that fear is at its maximum, it moves up another level. And another problem is that a lot of investors have run out of money to buy. A lot of the 'liquidity in the system' before the crisis was from loans; now, that has dried up.

In any case, whether a stock is cheap or not is still debatable. According to State Street Global Markets, its global Investor Confidence Index® for November fell another 1.4 points to a historic low of 57 points. Commenting on the index, Andrew Capon of State Street said: 'Investors face a difficult dilemma. On the one hand, equities are cheap. Using earnings adjusted for leverage and cyclicality, the equity strategy team at State Street Global Markets estimates that the US price-earnings multiple is 26 per cent below its 147-year average.

'These are levels seen only in periods of extreme dislocation such as the Great Depression, World War II and the 1870s. On the other hand, nobody can be confident that this current economic slowdown will not turn out to be just such a period rather than a more typical recession. 'So far, during this crisis, it is the bleakest forecasters who have been proved right.'

Indeed, we are in unprecedented times now. The euro area and Japan are now officially in recession. Even without the US officially joining this unhappy club, countries representing close to 50 per cent of global GDP are now seeing growth contract, noted Mr Capon. Consensus economic forecasts for GDP growth in the developed world have been falling for 16 months and are at 20-year lows.

Growth in the last seven years or so was propped up by debt-financed consumption from the US. And Asia has built up tremendous capacities to cater to that growth. Now, that consumption has contracted because the enormous financial leverage has to be unwound. That deleveraging process and contraction of consumption will drag on for some time because income has also diminished - if not totally disappeared, given the waves of job losses.

In Asia, companies have to deal with all the excess capacities and the vanishing demand. Many companies will go bust. Jobs will be lost, pay cut. In China, the hardship could trigger social unrest. It could be apocalyptic. We just don't know what will happen in the future.

But the fact is that we are now in the throes of a crisis and that itself may colour our judgment. 'Last year, it felt like the sky was the limit; now, it's like we are sinking into a bottomless pit,' said a friend.

Back to what economist Hyman Minsky says about the cycle of risk-taking: stability encourages risk-taking and complacency. But when a crisis strikes, people become shell-shocked and scared of investing their resources.

People also often overestimate the probability of the worst-case scenario after a crisis has occurred.

So, for the optimists out there (if there are still any left), here's an inspiring story.

In 1939, with Hitler's Germany ravaging Europe, John Templeton - who believed in buying into companies at points of what he called 'maximum pessimism' - bought US$100of every stock trading below US$1 on the New York and American stock exchanges.

Templeton's trade got him a junk pile of some 104 companies, 34 of which were bankrupt, for a total investment of roughly US$10,400. Four years later, he sold these stocks for more than US$40,000! Only four out of the 104 became worthless.

Yet another positive spin. A recession is also a good time to start a business. Costs are low. But it is not a good time to do financial deals - that's for a bull market, an investment banker told me recently.

Indeed, in a downturn, established firms tend to cut back on their growth investments to focus on defending their established core activities. That will create niches to be served by smaller companies. And once the start-ups develop to a certain size and the general economy picks up, there will be no lack of big company buyers that are willing to absorb these start-ups into their fold. That fits into the theory of starting a business in a recession and selling it in a bull market.

Well, here are some of the companies that were founded in downturns: Disney, Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard, Oracle and Cisco. There is no lack of examples in the local context as well. The first Sakae Sushi outlet was set up in September 1997. Financial PR, one of the largest investor relations firms in Singapore, was founded in August 2001.

Over the next year, there will certainly be more people forced to work for themselves because they will lose their jobs and not be able to find other suitable employment. And it will be no surprise if some of the talented people now unable to find work in an investment bank or other big company direct their energies towards creating a new generation of successful start- ups, said The Economist in a recent article.

I'm sure we all know of friends who created businesses which are now worth millions of dollars because they decided to venture out on their own after being retrenched. Retrenchment can be a blessing in disguise for some. (I knew someone who was retrenched by ST Aerospace, and today he is running his own business, and rich enough to buy a private landed property. I don't think he could afford it if he had remained as Senior Technician in ST Aerospace)

The key, I guess, is not to lose hope - despite how bleak the outlook may seem now. And if one were to assume risk, let it be with capital that one will not need for at least 3-5 years. In the meantime, be grateful for what you have - be it your health or time with your family.

The writer is a CFA charterholder

Thursday, 25 December 2008

Property investing - doing the math

MOST individual investors of real estate have a gut feel about whether they made, lost or broke even after holding their property for a certain period. In reality, few attempt to do the math to measure how well the investment truly performed and whether they were rewarded for the risks they took.

The only ones who are fairly confident of quantifying their profit or loss are the 'flippers' who speculate and deal in the sub-sale market without involving bank loans, rental income and outgoings.

This article takes the reader through two real-life case studies of investing in private residential properties in Singapore over two different time periods. The focus is on getting a sense of timing, time horizon, interest rates, rental yields and rate of returns. The outcome is to help an individual investor assess if real estate investing is worth the risks involved.

Case 1: 1982 to 1991

Not many of us will recall that there was a red-hot residential property market in Singapore in the early 1980s. Condominiums were making a splash and the Central Provident Fund was made available for investment in properties. It's hard to believe but mortgage rates were in the low teens in Singapore at that time. The particular property in this case was in the Pandan Valley area. It was a brand new 1,000 sq ft studio apartment that was launched at $300 per sq ft. The initial tenancy was at $2,500 a month. This translated to a gross rental yield of 10 per cent, bearing in mind that mortgage rates were around 13 per cent a year.

Everything was fine until the recession of 1984. The monthly rent dropped to $900. The value of the condo unit languished at the $200,000 level for the next two years. The gross rental yield fell to a more realistic 5.4 per cent (annual rental of $10,800 divided by prevailing market value of $200,000), almost in line with mortgage rates prevailing through the brief recession.

If the owner had sold the property after holding it for five years, the capital loss would have been massive. However, the property market recovered and by 1991, this studio apartment was sold for $400,000. The owner was not prepared to hold on because of the uncertainties connected with the first Gulf War.

More importantly, the investor decided to use the proceeds to upgrade his primary residence. Intuitively, he was satisfied that he had broken even in terms of cash flow. But he did not know (or care) that his actual internal rate of return (IRR) was only 6 per cent a year for the 10-year holding period.

Incidentally, an opportunistic investor who bought an identical unit in 1987 would have realised an IRR of 34 per cent a year in 1991. (see sidebar).

The question is: Was the investor who held the property from 1982 to 1991 - while suffering the throes of economic upheavals - fairly rewarded for the risks he took?

Case 2: 1996 to 2007

This period in time will be more familiar to most of us. The climax of the bull market of the 1990s came about unexpectedly when the government intervened in May 1996 with anti-speculation measures. Our second investor bought a brand-new condo in District 9, a few months prior to the drastic new housing rules. The 1,300 sq ft three-bedroom unit was acquired at $1,200 psf, or $1.56 million. The first tenant paid $4,500 a month for a gross rental yield of 3.6 percent. The interest rate was 5 per cent a year in the initial period, but steadily dropped to 1.5 per cent in 2001.

Till today, this condo is very marketable and the maximum period of vacancy between tenants was six weeks. The rent fell to $3,000 a month in 2000 for a gross yield of 4 per cent (annual rental of $36,000 divided by the market value of $900,000 in the downturn years).

Other property owners who did not have the holding power were forced to sell at a loss at around the turn of the millennium. Our investor took the lumps and hung on. By the end of 2006, with strong interest for second tier properties, the investment broke even compared to the original purchase price in 1996.

If this unit is sold today, the investor can pocket $1 million after settling with the bank (sales price of $1.8 million less outstanding mortgage of $800,000). The internal rate of return from the date of acquisition now stands at 3 percent a year over 11 long years.

The question is: Should the owner sell now or wait for a more respectable return? What is the appropriate benchmark to gauge if this investment has met the threshold for an acceptable return?

The two real-life cases were selected to demonstrate that timing in property investment is critical. Peak to peak time horizon within a property cycle may result in a lower than optimal rate of return. Investors cannot anticipate external forces that may derail the best laid plans. Speculators know this too well and they have no intention of holding property longer than necessary. It's simply capital gain they chase.

Exposure to real estate is part of a sound overall investment strategy. This exposure may not necessarily be in bricks and mortar (which has no liquidity) and should be beyond Singapore (for diversification). One alternative for liquidity and diversification is to invest in a portfolio of global property shares, funds and Reits. Due to higher risks, the expected rate of return from a well-timed property investment will be higher than a globally diversified portfolio of property securities.

If we assume an average inflation rate of 3 per cent a year in Singapore, then any investment should exceed this minimum return in the medium to long term. Then, there is the risk premium for property: an average net rental yield of 3 per cent and capital gain of 5 per cent add up to 8 per cent a year total return, or 5 per cent a year above inflation.

A useful proxy for the local landscape is the All Singapore Equities Property Index (left). The total return for the period August 1997 to August 2007 was 4 per cent a year. That's a dreadful performance indeed for the long-term investor in Singapore property stocks during this eventful decade. Maybe our Case 2 investor should not feel too badly after all.

In conclusion, investing in residential property provides pride of ownership and a hedge against inflation. Whether it delivers adequate income or capital gains to an investor depends on many factors. In a nutshell, the property investor should acquire a quality product, pay a reasonable price and have the ability to hold for a long enough time horizon to earn the appropriate return.

The property agent, conveyancing lawyer and banker play their part in the buying and selling of the asset. These roles are necessary to ensure a smooth transaction. An experienced financial adviser can offer advice on the required return on investment, asset allocation and risks connected with the property as part of an overall investment portfolio.



Roy Varghese is director, financial planning practice at ipac Singapore. The views expressed are his.

Investing in property may be less profitable than buying shares

Investing in property may be less profitable than buying shares

SHARE markets have generally produced higher investment returns than residential property over the long term.

Theoretically, then, those who rent a property and invest their money in quality shares should be wealthier than those who concentrate on paying off their homes.

However, the discipline of meeting regular mortgage payments and gradually taking ownership of a tangible asset, means home owners usually do better financially than those who rent.

Nevertheless, investing in residential property other than your family home is likely to result in higher risk and lower returns than investing in quality shares.

An economy in which business is performing well is likely to be one in which the property market is also growing strongly.

One of the main reasons shares outperform property over long periods is that demand for property, in a market-based economy, is derived from the success of business.

Of course, the business cycle and the property market do not work in perfect lockstep.

There are periods of economic stagnation in which the property market enjoys a 'catch-up' boom, and periods of recovery in which it goes through a down cycle.

On average, the risks of investing in property are understated and returns from investing in property are overstated.

As a result, investors pour too much money into residential property, forcing prices higher than they would be if investors accounted fully for the potential risks and returns.

Five myths about property investment hold sway in every boom:

- Property values are not as volatile as share prices;

- Property prices never fall;

- Property prices might fall occasionally, but never as far as share prices;

- Property prices rise with the cost of living, so investment in property always keeps you ahead of inflation; and

The only way to lose money on property is to buy real estate in a declining population centre, or a house on the main road.

So why are property risks understated?

Property seems easy to understand, so investors may have a perception of control. Property has the ability to elicit an emotional response unlike shares or bonds, which lack the sense of substance and permanence that attracts people to property.

Just as important, the pricing of residential property is infrequent and informal. Property investors never see red ink on a statement unless it is on the day of the sale.

And most property investors never formally evaluate the performance of their investments at all. Imagine if you looked in a newspaper at the price of your home each day, just as you do with the price of your shares. Your attitude to risk would most likely be quite different.

Returns achieved from property are also generally overstated, which has the effect of further narrowing the risk/return trade-off for the asset.

Indexes that measure property market performance generally capture only the increase in the sale price of existing dwellings, but fail to take into account major developments in a nation's housing stock.

Share investors can effectively 'buy the market' and participate in its long-term performance because of the ready availability of accumulation indexes that are net of costs incurred in achieving gains.

Investors cannot 'buy' the return of the residential property market like this, because the sales measures available are gross of costs such as construction outlays.

In practical terms, investing in residential property has it own risks, not unlike investing in a single stock. While these risks can be mitigated through research into location, the quality of the property and so on, opportunities for broad diversification and protection of a residential property investment portfolio are more restricted.

The one main advantage of investing in residential property is that individual investors with time on their hands have a greater ability to add value to their investment.

For many people, buying a family home is their one truly effective means of saving.

But for the amateur investor, who does not wish to become a property investor, investing in a residential property is likely to be expensive, more time-consuming and riskier than investing in a well-run, diversified share portfolio. And it will probably yield a lower return too.

Arun Abey and Andrew Ford
Sun, Oct 28, 2007
The Sunday Times

Tuesday, 23 December 2008

Noble - Got it back @ 0.96

Gone fishing at Batam for 2 nights and now back to Market to fish for Noble. Oh, got a catch @ 0.96. Hope for a biggie. Cheers!

Wednesday, 17 December 2008

Noble - consolidating or breakout coming?

I won't make the same MISTAKE

During the lunch break, one guy wearing a T-shirt with his back facing me with the words "I won't make the same MISTAKE" sitting directly opposite my table.

Hey, it is disturbing and reminding me of the repeated mistakes that I have made that leading to big losses in 2008. I have already chopped off all the five fingers on the left hand. Any more same mistake, I got to chop off the toes now as I can't probably chop off the fingers on the right hand while still holding a chopper.

Really no more same MISTAKE!!! Cheers.

Noble - Santa filled the Noel Socking @ 1.11

Noble again provided weekly allowance.


Round 4 (1st Half): ROC 14%, 8 days
Round 3: ROC 7.1%, 8 days
Round 2: ROC 31.6%, 20 days
Round 1: ROC 16.3%, 28 days

Tuesday, 16 December 2008

Noble - consolidating?

Trade successfully for a Pillow Stock

It is my dream to trade successfully for a series of wins and to get a pillow stock, and slowly over time to build up a portfolio of pillow stocks to become a bed for me to sleep soundly and have nice dreams.

Hope that in 2009 this dream will come true. Cheers.

Saturday, 13 December 2008

When it comes to Money Management - irrational behaviour?

A 45-year-old widow - believed to have lost HK$5 million of her late husband's insurance money in Lehman minibonds - was discovered on Thursday night trying to kill herself, local media reported.

Irrational behaviour - dump all eggs to buy one Golden Goose to lay golden eggs and hopefully to grow into a Golden Cow.

Having lunch with a colleague, she has about $200K saving and thinking of dumping into property next year. Wise investing or irrational behaviour like dumping all eggs to buy one Golden Goose to lay golden eggs and hopefully to grow into a Golden Cow.

The couple is working with two pre-school kids. Wise investing strategy? Hope so. Going forward. How bad and how long will this recession last? Nobody can be sure of staying employed or future earning will not be cut. Once cut, it will unlikely to be restored.

Their kids are growing up and entering school soon, their family expenses are going up, and will ever be increasing until their kids start working. Saving is going to be harder and not easier.

Expenses on kids will be the biggest single household expenses going forward after their residential home.

With $200K, and using leveraged Golden Goose to lay eggs and hopefully to grow the Golden Goose into Golden Cow. Wise investing?

The big difference between stock and property investing is the risk and leverage factors. Stocks are always riskier as company can go bankrupt, but it can be mitigated through money management by not exposing any one counter to more than 5% of your capital or portfolio value (periodically, taking off some profit to re balance the portfolio.

When you invested in stocks, most likely you are investing your own money to make money. When you lose, you lose your own money and that is all.

When you buy property, most likely you will be leveraged and you are using somebody Else's money to make money. When you cannot pay up, and since it is not your money, the lender is going after your blood to make sure that his money is safe.

When the tide is high, the beach looks so beautiful and the sea water so clear. When the tide ebbs and becomes so low, the sea water becomes so muddy, and the beach now looked so dirty and ugly. You will be sorry how you have ended in this beach.

So one has to decide the right strategy: To have an Investment Strategy of 20 Ugly Ducklings, and hopefully a few of these Ugly Ducklings will turn into some Beautiful Swans or one Golden Goose that turns into a Golden Cow.

Finally, it is ROC over a particular time frame that counts. Probably, the attractiveness in Property Investing over Stock Investing is that you can afford to be lazy and there is no need to watch the Market and property as an asset class is relatively safer.

It is damned tiring and heartbreaking to watch your portfolio dropping each day.

But, hey when your valuation of your property or your car drop, you feel okay leh.

Strange behaviour hor???

---------------------------------------------------------

I hope she will understand what I am telling her. Probably, by looking at her facial expression, she may think that I am a Heartlander and know nuts about property investing.

Thursday, 11 December 2008

Noble - still in up trend?

Wednesday, 10 December 2008

Noble - breaking resistance?

Tuesday, 9 December 2008

Is STI nearer or farther away from 1200?

To wait for 1200 or to jump in at the next correction.

Like a man who once saw ten rabbits coming out from a hole to chew at juicy grasses near the hole. He quickly approached the rabbits with a small net hoping to catch some, but the rabbits saw him coming and quickly jump back into the hole.

Later, he went back home to prepare a huge net to catch the rabbits. This time, he stood near the hole and waited patiently for the rabbits to come out of the hole. If the rabbits appeared, he would then scoop them up with his huge net. But, alas, he waited each day, but no rabbit came out of the hole.

Many days has passed but still no rabbits so he waited and waited ...

Noble - Looking at Exit, where?



Life of a Trader is hard. After getting onto the HIGHWAY, now have to look EXIT or may get crushed again.

Noble- Got @ 0.965 for Round 4

Bought @ 0.965 after waiting for Christmas Sale which somehow did not start early

Wednesday, 3 December 2008

Noble - another day of waiting

What is Wealth? I am not Rich nor a Millionaire

Wealth as measured by time

Wealth has also been defined as "the amount of time an individual can maintain his current lifestyle for, without any new income." For example if a person has $1000, and their lifestyle dictates $1000 per week of expenses, then their wealth is measured as 1 week. Under this definition, a person with $10,000 of savings and expenses of $1000 per week (10 weeks of wealth) would be considered wealthier than a person with $20,000 of savings and expenses of $5000 per week (4 weeks of wealth).

The difference between income and wealth

Wealth is a stock that can be represented in an accounting balance sheet, meaning that it is a total accumulation over time, that can be seen in a snapshot. Income is a flow, meaning it is a rate of change, as represented in an Income/Expense or Cashflow Statement. Income represents the increase in wealth (as can be quantified on a Cashflow statement), expenses the decrease in wealth.

If you limit wealth to net worth, then mathematically net income (income minus expenses) can be thought of as the first derivative of wealth, representing the change in wealth over a period of time.

Sustainable wealth

According to the author of Wealth Odyssey, Larry R. Frank Sr, wealth is what sustains you when you are not working. It is net worth, not income, which is important when you retire or are unable to work (premature loss of income due to injury or illness is actually a risk management issue).

The key question is how long would a certain wealth last? Ongoing withdrawal research has sustainable withdrawal rates anywhere between approximately 3 percent and 8 percent, depending on the research’s assumptions. Time, how long wealth might last, then becomes a function of how many times does the percentage withdrawal rate go into all the assets. Example: withdrawing 3 percent a year into 100 percent equals 33.3 years; 4 percent equals 25 years (My Targetted Wealth); 8 percent equals 12.5 years, etc.

This ignores any growth, which presumably would be used to offset the effects of inflation. Growth greater than the withdrawal rate would extend the time assets may last, while negative growth would reduce the time assets may last. Clearly a lower withdrawal rate is more conservative. Knowing this helps you determine how much wealth you need also. Example: you know you will need $40,000 a year and use a 4 percent withdrawal rate, then you need to use 5 percent and therefore need $800,000, etc. This simple “wealth rule” helps you estimate both the time and the amount.

Finally, I am not Rich nor a Millionaire. Know the difference.
Related Posts with Thumbnails