I started serious Investing Journey in Jan 2000 to create wealth through long-term investing and short-term trading; but as from April 2013 my Journey in Investinghas changed to create Retirement Income for Life till 85 years old in 2041 for two persons over market cycles of Bull and Bear.
Since 2017 after retiring from full-time job as employee; I am moving towards Investing Nirvana - Freehold Investment Income for Life investing strategy where 100% of investment income from portfolio investment is cashed out to support household expenses i.e. not a single cent of re-investing!
It is 57% (2017 to Aug 2022) to the Land of Investing Nirvana - Freehold Income for Life!
This blog is authored by an old multi-bagger blue chips stock picker uncle from HDB heartland!
"The market is not your mother. It consists of tough men and women who look for ways to take money away from you instead of pouring milk into your mouth."- Dr. Alexander Elder
"For the things we have to learn before we can do them, we learn by doing them." - Aristotle
It is here where I share with you how I did it! FREE Education in stock market wisdom.
Our networth chart follows simliar trend in that in the initial years, the growth rate is low (very low gradient) and the rate of growth started to get faster as we get more established in our careers.
In fact, I observed three separate regions of growth rate in our networth chart. In the initial ten to 15 years of our working career, the rate of growth was very low such that I would only update our networth chart every three months to half yearly period. It was like not moving.
In the second 10 year stretch, the rate of growth started to pick up, and I also started to update it every quarter and then monthly. Not only that, I also started to split up the networth chart into a liquid networth chart and an lliquid networth to better track the components in my liquid networth chart. The illiquid networth comprises our two properties and our monies in the MA, SA and RA. Obviously the illiquid networth grows at a slower clip.
It was in the last 10 year stretch that I update both charts every month because the growth rate becomes quite substantial. In the last five years, we were saving 100% and more of our earned incomes. We are in a situation of we are earning more and yet save more.
So the question is, is it our investment that is accelerating our networth growth or is it because we are earning more in our later years? Looking in detail into the data, I would say our investment (especially the passive income) helps in providing the "floor" or "foundation" from which our networth can grow faster with our earned incomes. In other words, the higher earned incomes in our later years were the accelerator to the higher growth in our networth while the investment was the enabler.
As long as we have money in investment, we face the risk of losses or "reset".
We are trying to minimise this "reset" risk by channelling our later savings into our CPF, much to the consternation of SMOL. :-)
We do this to reduce our risk exposure to investment (in percentage terms) as we near and eventually go into retirement. This is consistent with the widely given advise that retirees should reduce exposure to loans and investment in equities and allocate more resources to income generating instruments.
Without earned income, retirees simply do not have the runway to rejuvenate their investment in equities after a reset, unless they have a huge warchest (like in their CPF OA).
As shared earlier, our approach is to build up our CPF savings sufficiently so that we can just live off the interests from our OA & SA, supplemented by the CPF Life payout (aiming for $110,000 a year). Any dividend and rental income will be the icing on the cake.
No. There's no consternation; there's only bemusement poking ;)
Context is needed.
OLd fogeys like you who have made your CONCENTRATED pots of gold (in your case its multiple properties) OUTSIDE of CPF are not the target audience for those who espouse the virtues in voluntarily contributions of CPF.
Not when you can "easily" withdraw any excess CPF funds after age 65 ;)
If I'm big daddy, I would prefer any voluntarily contributed CPF funds stay locked-up longer as in decades? No?
Then there are youths who know how to "take full advantage" of their voluntarily contributions from their early 20s or 30s.
Yes, they do voluntarily contribute "extra" into CPF. but these youths will pull every cent allowed OUT from CPF making investments with CPFIS or using CPF to buy property to the max allowed.
Hey! CPF is a great "parking lot" for opportunity funds! (Different from savings OK?)
Their CPF is like during your early days - pitifully "low" despite their extra voluntary contributions ;)
So there you go!
When people say they voluntarily contribute to CPF, there are 2 groups:
1. The EARN MORE savvy ones who are milking the system to the hilt!
2. The SAVE MORE salt of the earth ones who don't know they have given up what you call as "enablers" ;)
Like buying fish, no poke how to tell the difference?
Readers who didn't know your back story may be forgiven to think you are "risk adverse" like them...
Have different take. Am a long term buy & hold investor, not worry about "reset", have went through these several times since Black Monday 1987. Issue is whether counters wound rebound after the crisis, i.e., prices went down because of general market sentiment and not because of changes in company fundamentals. Have learnt from bitter experiences to only pick counters with good fundamentals and consistent and sustainable dividends such as DBS, SGX, Haw Par. Actualy had accumulated more of such counters at each "reset".
Could refund CPF withdrawn for property purchases to boast OA & SA, but decided not to. Have topped up wife & own RSS to Enhanced & prevailing max for the year every year. Plan to withdraw at 67 or later, by then combined payout should be about $5000/month, a good enough safety net. Instead, cash is invested in several asset classes, with different risks. From almost "zero" risk annuities (private version of "CPF Life"), to slightly higher risk bonds funds to reits and dividend generating equities. Expect to generate average ~5% yield from these diverse investments to provide the remaining 75% regular passive income.
No body is sure, for simple retail investors with incomplete info like us, best guide is history + a little analysis of the impacts of the root cause of the crash on the company's operating environments. If a company with good fundamentals (healthy balance sheet, consistent & stable earnings for last 5/10 years etc) recovered from all previous crashes, chances are it would also recover from the present crash, unless the root cause of the crash has changed the business landscape (e.g., SIA & COVID). Agreed it is still a Tikam, even for WB.
My Family Holiday To Thailand’s Bangkok With 2 Kids
-
[image: family-holiday-to-thailand-bangkok]
This was the first time that my family is travelling with 2 kids, a
prospect that I quietly fear because I do n...
Happy new year 2024 and review of 2023
-
How fast! Another year has passed... 2023 has been a great year for most
investors (except those who invest in Hong Kong/China/Thailand markets),
which t...
Rolf 2023 in Review, Looking forward to 2024!
-
Happy new year to all. This post came late. But better late than never,
:-). Looking back, 2023 has been one of the most eventful
The post Rolf 2023 in R...
Hello SP Group, I'm Back!
-
Yup, I've moved back to Big Daddy's electricity provider this month.
To recap and have a better sense of context, you may want to read my
previous 18...
UOB One vs DBS Multiplier
-
This is a long overdue post. A lot of bloggers have already commented on
the high interest rates of banks this past few months. I find that I still
have ...
Farewell, Uncle CW8888
-
On 8 April 2023, I lost a friend.
To honour the memory of Uncle CW8888, let me share a few nuggets of wisdom
I have learned from him as well as some of t...
To my beloved friend CW8888
-
It is with infinite sadness that I came out from my hiding hole to blog
about the passing of a dear friend, CW8888, whom I affectionately call
senior bro...
1H2021 In 10 Mins
-
If one were to wonder, it has slowly becomes a thing in my recent writing
style that I’m disclosing lesser details compared to what I would have done
in ...
Festina Lente Redux - Five years down the road
-
A big apology to the few readers (if any) who read this blog.
About five years so, I had made a pivot to ETF based exposure to a global
financial portfo...
Nov 2020 - Yaruzi's Portfolio Update
-
The stock market bounced back from October lows with the news that Pfizer
vaccines found to be 95% effective. I received some cash proceeds from the
sale o...
Get big Muscles with Testosteron improvement
-
Muskelaufbautraining mit Nahrungsergänzungen wie macht man das richtig?
Muskelaufbau ist nicht einfach und schnell, wie es viele Sportler erwarten
geht ...
How can Brexit affect us?
-
Recently there's been quite a lot of talk about Brexit in the financial
markets and its impact on the markets. So, what really is Brexit and what
is its im...
-
*Welcome to Singapore Investment Bloggers!*
This site provides an updated listing of investment blogs based in
Singapore.
If you would like your blog t...
Last updated : 24 Sep 2022
I am 66 yrs old uncle living in HDB heartland who has achieved financial independence @ 56 and finally retired @ 60 from full-time job as employee on 1 Oct 2016.
Single household income since 1995 with three children.
Currently, two sons and one daughter are working.
I have been doing 22 years of long-term investing and short-term trading in Singapore stock market only since Jan 2000 so I am that so-called Panda or Koala in the investment world.
Currently, I am on my way to Investing Nirvana - Freehold Investment Income for Life after 23 years of building up Investment Portfolio through long-term investing for growth-dividends and short-term trading on Rounds after Rounds.
I have also achieved sustainable retirement income for life from CPF and Year-on-year Diminishing Bear Market Impact stock Investment Portfolio in local market, SGX! i.e. Beary Safe!
Cheers!
Disclaimer: Stock trading involves significant risks. Create Wealth trader is not a licensed Investment Adviser and will not be responsible for any losses which you incurred. You are advised to always do your own homework before making any trading decision.
Hi Uncle8888,
ReplyDeleteI'd say it's good to know/good to have.
Remember the personal finance pyramid?
There are more important/ fundamental aspects which if well taken care of, most people can do fine without needing to get into "investing". 😉
For those of us who have the interest & ability to muck around with financial markets, well, it's a bonus and a privilege! 😁
Our networth chart follows simliar trend in that in the initial years, the growth rate is low (very low gradient) and the rate of growth started to get faster as we get more established in our careers.
ReplyDeleteIn fact, I observed three separate regions of growth rate in our networth chart. In the initial ten to 15 years of our working career, the rate of growth was very low such that I would only update our networth chart every three months to half yearly period. It was like not moving.
In the second 10 year stretch, the rate of growth started to pick up, and I also started to update it every quarter and then monthly. Not only that, I also started to split up the networth chart into a liquid networth chart and an lliquid networth to better track the components in my liquid networth chart. The illiquid networth comprises our two properties and our monies in the MA, SA and RA. Obviously the illiquid networth grows at a slower clip.
It was in the last 10 year stretch that I update both charts every month because the growth rate becomes quite substantial. In the last five years, we were saving 100% and more of our earned incomes. We are in a situation of we are earning more and yet save more.
So the question is, is it our investment that is accelerating our networth growth or is it because we are earning more in our later years? Looking in detail into the data, I would say our investment (especially the passive income) helps in providing the "floor" or "foundation" from which our networth can grow faster with our earned incomes. In other words, the higher earned incomes in our later years were the accelerator to the higher growth in our networth while the investment was the enabler.
The down side of long only long-term investors is that Mr Market likes to press Reset button along the investing journey.
DeleteThose lost years in recovery from a big Reset!
Anyone started thinking on how to soften the impact of next Reset button pressed by Mr Market? How?
As long as we have money in investment, we face the risk of losses or "reset".
ReplyDeleteWe are trying to minimise this "reset" risk by channelling our later savings into our CPF, much to the consternation of SMOL. :-)
We do this to reduce our risk exposure to investment (in percentage terms) as we near and eventually go into retirement. This is consistent with the widely given advise that retirees should reduce exposure to loans and investment in equities and allocate more resources to income generating instruments.
Without earned income, retirees simply do not have the runway to rejuvenate their investment in equities after a reset, unless they have a huge warchest (like in their CPF OA).
As shared earlier, our approach is to build up our CPF savings sufficiently so that we can just live off the interests from our OA & SA, supplemented by the CPF Life payout (aiming for $110,000 a year). Any dividend and rental income will be the icing on the cake.
mysecretinvestment,
DeleteNo. There's no consternation; there's only bemusement poking ;)
Context is needed.
OLd fogeys like you who have made your CONCENTRATED pots of gold (in your case its multiple properties) OUTSIDE of CPF are not the target audience for those who espouse the virtues in voluntarily contributions of CPF.
Not when you can "easily" withdraw any excess CPF funds after age 65 ;)
If I'm big daddy, I would prefer any voluntarily contributed CPF funds stay locked-up longer as in decades? No?
Then there are youths who know how to "take full advantage" of their voluntarily contributions from their early 20s or 30s.
Yes, they do voluntarily contribute "extra" into CPF. but these youths will pull every cent allowed OUT from CPF making investments with CPFIS or using CPF to buy property to the max allowed.
Hey! CPF is a great "parking lot" for opportunity funds! (Different from savings OK?)
Their CPF is like during your early days - pitifully "low" despite their extra voluntary contributions ;)
So there you go!
When people say they voluntarily contribute to CPF, there are 2 groups:
1. The EARN MORE savvy ones who are milking the system to the hilt!
2. The SAVE MORE salt of the earth ones who don't know they have given up what you call as "enablers" ;)
Like buying fish, no poke how to tell the difference?
Readers who didn't know your back story may be forgiven to think you are "risk adverse" like them...
LOL!
Have different take. Am a long term buy & hold investor, not worry about "reset", have went through these several times since Black Monday 1987. Issue is whether counters wound rebound after the crisis, i.e., prices went down because of general market sentiment and not because of changes in company fundamentals. Have learnt from bitter experiences to only pick counters with good fundamentals and consistent and sustainable dividends such as DBS, SGX, Haw Par. Actualy had accumulated more of such counters at each "reset".
ReplyDeleteCould refund CPF withdrawn for property purchases to boast OA & SA, but decided not to. Have topped up wife & own RSS to Enhanced & prevailing max for the year every year. Plan to withdraw at 67 or later, by then combined payout should be about $5000/month, a good enough safety net. Instead, cash is invested in several asset classes, with different risks. From almost "zero" risk annuities (private version of "CPF Life"), to slightly higher risk bonds funds to reits and dividend generating equities. Expect to generate average ~5% yield from these diverse investments to provide the remaining 75% regular passive income.
No body is sure, for simple retail investors with incomplete info like us, best guide is history + a little analysis of the impacts of the root cause of the crash on the company's operating environments. If a company with good fundamentals (healthy balance sheet, consistent & stable earnings for last 5/10 years etc) recovered from all previous crashes, chances are it would also recover from the present crash, unless the root cause of the crash has changed the business landscape (e.g., SIA & COVID). Agreed it is still a Tikam, even for WB.
ReplyDelete